Loading…
sealvo.com · USPTO Trademark Record
https://sealvo.com/warp-78223210

Scientific, research, navigation, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, audiovisual, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, detecting, testing, inspecting, life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling the distribution or use of electricity; apparatus and instruments for recording, transmitting, reproducing or processing sound, images or data; recorded and downloadable multimedia files, computer software, blank digital or analogue recording and storage media; mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating devices; computers and computer peripheral devices; diving suits, divers' masks, ear plugs for divers, nose clips for divers, gloves for divers, breathing apparatus for underwater swimming; fire-extinguishing apparatus.
WARP (Serial No. 78223210), Registration No. 0, is a abandoned US trademark filed on Mar 07, 2003 by Brainbow, Inc.. This trademark covers Class 009 (Electronics, software & scientific instruments).
Full conflict analysis for WARP (SN 78223210) against the USPTO database with detailed risk factor explanations. AI-powered — takes ~1-2 min.
WARP (Reg. #0) is an abandoned US trademark that was filed in 2003 but has since been abandoned. The mark covers Class 009 (Electronics, software & scientific instruments). Goods and services include Scientific, research, navigation, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, audiovisual, optical, weighing, measuring, s.... The mark faced 1 opposition proceeding during prosecution.
FILED
Mar 07, 2003
SERIAL
78223210
REG#
0
REGISTERED
Dec 31, 1969
Applicant
Brainbow, Inc.Corporation
FL
1730 South Federal Hwy, Delray Beach, FL, 33483
US
Attorney
David Bogart Dort Dort Patent Corp.
BRAN.T002.9
Box 26219 Crystal City Station, Arlington, VA 22215, UNITED STATES
AI attorney analyzes your proposed mark against USPTO — Go/No-Go verdict, class-by-class risks, and strategy recommendations.
FILED
2003
YEARS AGO
23y
CLASSES
1
MADRID FILINGS
—
Free USPTO lookups by name, owner, or serial number. No account needed.
CLASSES
1
OFFICE
USPTO
COUNTRY
US
First use anywhere: Jun 01, 1996
First use in commerce: Jun 01, 1996
Scientific, research, navigation, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, audiovisual, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, detecting, testing, inspecting, life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling the distribution or use of electricity; apparatus and instruments for recording, transmitting, reproducing or processing sound, images or data; recorded and downloadable multimedia files, computer software, blank digital or analogue recording and storage media; mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating devices; computers and computer peripheral devices; diving suits, divers' masks, ear plugs for divers, nose clips for divers, gloves for divers, breathing apparatus for underwater swimming; fire-extinguishing apparatus.
This description is as filed with the USPTO and defines the scope of trademark protection.
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 23, 2008ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Jun 22, 2008EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Jun 22, 2008ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
Apr 03, 2008EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN
Dec 28, 2007SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN
EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2007EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
Dec 28, 2007NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 01, 2007JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 24, 2007EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2007ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Jul 30, 2007SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 30, 2007NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jul 24, 2007JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 22, 2007EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 18, 2007AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 18, 2007DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 18, 2007EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
ASSIGNED TO LIE
May 29, 2007ASSIGNED TO LIE
PAPER RECEIVED
May 22, 2007PAPER RECEIVED
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 22, 2007CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
May 22, 2007DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
Jan 29, 2007SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN
ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2007ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 24, 2007TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2007TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2007TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2007TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 23, 2007CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
ASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 17, 2006ASSIGNED TO LIE
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
Nov 17, 2006FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN
Nov 17, 2006SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN
AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 17, 2006AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 17, 2006CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
PAPER RECEIVED
Jan 04, 2006PAPER RECEIVED
STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jun 30, 2005STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN
Jun 30, 2005SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
Jun 30, 2005NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED
Jun 21, 2005TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED
USE AMENDMENT FILED
Jun 21, 2005USE AMENDMENT FILED
NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT
Dec 28, 2004NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT
PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION
Oct 05, 2004PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION
NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 15, 2004NOTICE OF PUBLICATION
LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 02, 2004LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
ASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 02, 2004ASSIGNED TO LIE
PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 28, 2004PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED
Jul 28, 2004SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED
APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 28, 2004APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jul 27, 2004TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
Jul 21, 2004TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 21, 2004CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 17, 2004TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 07, 2004TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
EMAIL RECEIVED
Jan 23, 2004EMAIL RECEIVED
UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2004UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED
Jan 21, 2004DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE E-MAILED
AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED
Jan 21, 2004AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED
AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jan 09, 2004AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE
PAPER RECEIVED
Dec 09, 2003PAPER RECEIVED
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 09, 2003CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
USE AMENDMENT FILED
Dec 08, 2003USE AMENDMENT FILED
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 08, 2003CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
Aug 28, 2003NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 25, 2003ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Additional USPTO filings from the same owner.
Recently filed and registered marks in the same international class.
Additional USPTO filings handled by the same attorney of record.