Loading…
sealvo.com · USPTO Trademark Record
https://sealvo.com/cube-77456981

Scientific, research, navigation, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, audiovisual, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, detecting, testing, inspecting, life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling the distribution or use of electricity; apparatus and instruments for recording, transmitting, reproducing or processing sound, images or data; recorded and downloadable multimedia files, computer software, blank digital or analogue recording and storage media; mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating devices; computers and computer peripheral devices; diving suits, divers' masks, ear plugs for divers, nose clips for divers, gloves for divers, breathing apparatus for underwater swimming; fire-extinguishing apparatus.
CUBE (Serial No. 77456981), Registration No. 0, is a abandoned US trademark filed on Apr 24, 2008 by Coherent, Inc.. This trademark covers Class 009 (Electronics, software & scientific instruments).
CUBE (Reg. #0) is an abandoned US trademark that was filed in 2008 but has since been abandoned. The mark covers Class 009 (Electronics, software & scientific instruments). Goods and services include Scientific, research, navigation, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, audiovisual, optical, weighing, measuring, s....
FILED
Apr 24, 2008
SERIAL
77456981
REG#
0
Applicant
Coherent, Inc.Corporation
DE
5100 Patrick Henry Drive, Santa Clara, CA, 95054
US
Attorney
MARLENE J WILLIAMS NIXON PEABODY LLP
810981-301
ONE EMBARCADERO CENTER, SUITE 1800, SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111, UNITED STATES
AI attorney analyzes your proposed mark against USPTO — Go/No-Go verdict, class-by-class risks, and strategy recommendations.
FILED
2008
YEARS AGO
18y
CLASSES
1
MADRID FILINGS
1
Free USPTO lookups by name, owner, or serial number. No account needed.
This mark has 1 Madrid Protocol filing on record with the USPTO.
Source: USPTO Madrid International Filing Requests
CLASSES
1
OFFICE
USPTO
COUNTRY
US
First use anywhere: Sep 30, 2004
First use in commerce: Sep 30, 2004
Scientific, research, navigation, surveying, photographic, cinematographic, audiovisual, optical, weighing, measuring, signalling, detecting, testing, inspecting, life-saving and teaching apparatus and instruments; apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling the distribution or use of electricity; apparatus and instruments for recording, transmitting, reproducing or processing sound, images or data; recorded and downloadable multimedia files, computer software, blank digital or analogue recording and storage media; mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers, calculating devices; computers and computer peripheral devices; diving suits, divers' masks, ear plugs for divers, nose clips for divers, gloves for divers, breathing apparatus for underwater swimming; fire-extinguishing apparatus.
This description is as filed with the USPTO and defines the scope of trademark protection.
ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 30, 2013ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Sep 10, 2013EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Sep 10, 2013ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Jul 09, 2013ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 09, 2013ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
Jul 09, 2013NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 30, 2013CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 30, 2013TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
May 28, 2013EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
May 28, 2013JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
May 28, 2013EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
May 28, 2013TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Nov 28, 2012FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
Nov 28, 2012FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED
NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Nov 28, 2012NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Oct 29, 2012SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 19, 2012REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 18, 2011REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
May 23, 2011TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 14, 2011REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
ASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 14, 2010ASSIGNED TO LIE
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Oct 14, 2010REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Apr 11, 2010REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
ASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 15, 2010ASSIGNED TO LIE
SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Mar 15, 2010SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Sep 14, 2009SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 14, 2009LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Sep 14, 2009NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2009TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 21, 2009CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 21, 2009TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
Feb 23, 2009NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2009NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
Feb 23, 2009NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2009TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED
CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 29, 2009CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 29, 2009TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jan 29, 2009TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 06, 2008TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
Jul 31, 2008NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN
NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
Jul 31, 2008NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
Jul 31, 2008NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED
ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 24, 2008ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
NEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 28, 2008NEW APPLICATION ENTERED
Additional USPTO filings from the same owner.
Recently filed and registered marks in the same international class.
Additional USPTO filings handled by the same attorney of record.